CI and the Developer







Section 106

Section 106 (S106) is how we refer to the works that developers have to do, or to make a financial contribution towards, in order that their development does not adversely affect the local community.

Section 106 (S106)

Click on heading in list of contents or scroll down



    Section 106

The name refers to S106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, which allows a Local Planning Authority (LPA) to enter into a legally-binding agreement or Planning Obligation with a landowner in association with the granting of planning permission.

The obligation is termed a Section 106 Agreement.

These agreements are a way of delivering or addressing matters that are necessary to make a development acceptable in planning terms.

They are increasingly used to support the provision of services and infrastructure, such as highways, recreational facilities, education, health and affordable housing.

The scope of such agreements is laid out in the Government’s Circular 05/2005.
Matters agreed as part of a S106 must be:
 

  • relevant to planning
  • necessary to make the proposed development acceptable in planning terms
  • directly related to the proposed development
  • fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the proposed development 
  • reasonable in all other respects.
A Council’s approach to securing benefits through the S106 process should be grounded in evidence-based policy.


    Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) 4

Achieving positive planning through the use of planning obligations.

Bristol City Council has drawn up a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) for developer contributions SPD 4

The SPD comprises two parts.

  • Part One sets out the Council’s overall approach to Planning Obligations;
  • Part Two details the policy justification, threshold and where relevant, the formulae used to calculate the appropriate level of obligation for the various areas where the Council may wish to seek obligations.

This covers the following areas where developer contributions may be sought:

  • (i)  Affordable Housing
  • (ii) Educational Facilities
  • (iii) Recreational Facilities
  • (iv) Landscape Schemes
  • (v) Travel Plan Initiatives
  • (vi) Park and Ride Facilities
  • (vii) Highway Infrastructure Works
    (including fees for processing Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs))
  • (viii) Site Specific Measures
  • (ix) Economic Contributions from New Development
  • (x) Areas of Public Realm
  • (xi) Public Art
  • (xii) Community Forest Initiative
  • (xiii) Library Facilities


    Community input into Planning Obligations

Under the Statement of Community Involvement the Planning Authority has set out the way in which local community groups can come to a view on what Planning Obligations should apply.
See p 21 in the Statement of Community Involvement.

The community can set their views out at Pre Application stage and these should be incorporated into the Community Involvement Statement.

The Planning Officer will take into account these views when negotiating the obligations with the developer.


    S106 Financial Contributions List

A full list of s106 developer contributions is kept by the Planning Obligations Manager.

This is updated and is currently issued to the Ward Councillors and NPN Administrator monthly.

NPN planning groups can ask for the relevant S106 information for their ward from the Planning Obligations Manager or NPN Administrators.


    Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)

Extracts from briefing note by Planning Obligations Manager

CIL will be a levy that Local Authorities with an up to date Development Plan (an Adopted Core Strategy in Bristol's case) can introduce.

It will require developers to make a payment to the Council based on the size of their development in square metres.

The Council can then use the proceeds of the levy to provide local and sub-regional infrastructure necessary to support growth.

If Bristol were to seek to introduce a CIL, the earliest that it is likely it could be in place is Spring / Summer 2011.

In the two years following this, Section 106 and Bristol’s SPD 4 would then be scaled back.

It is proposed that CIL will apply to all development in excess of 100 square metres.

CIL will also apply to development of less that 100 square metres that results in the provision of one or more dwellings.

The amount of CIL payable will be determined at the point of granting planning permission.

It will be based on the gross size of the development in square metres, which will be identified on the Planning Application form, and the CIL rate per square metre, which will be identified in the Charging Schedule.

It will be index linked from the year that the CIL was introduced to the year that Planning Permission is granted.

CIL must be spent on infrastructure, which in simple terms means something that requires construction of some sort. Obvious examples include schools, parks, roads, flood defences, park and ride sites, libraries, doctor’s surgeries, fire stations, railways etc.

It is not clear whether CIL can be used for ongoing revenue support, for example funding supported bus services.

CIL can be spent by the authority that collects it.

The collecting Authority can also choose to pass CIL receipts to other infrastructure providers in order to contribute towards the provision of infrastructure that it could not provide itself.
For example CIL could be forwarded to the Fire Authority if a new fire station was required, a neighbouring Local Authority if new infrastructure was required in their area that benefited the collecting Authority, or a Government body such as the Environment Agency if new flood defences were required.

If Bristol were to introduce a CIL, a mechanism for allocating receipts would need to be put in place.


    How CIL will differ from S106

How CIL will differ from S106

CIL will differ from Section 106 in a number of ways:
  • The purpose of CIL is to contribute towards the provision of infrastructure required to support growth, whereas Section 106 is for the mitigation of the impact of a specific development.
  • All eligible development will be required to pay CIL.
  • CIL will not be a matter that can be appealed through the planning system, and there can be no negotiation on it.
  • CIL will not be related to the development from which it came, as it is intended to fund infrastructure required to support growth across the development plan area. Consequently the Section 106 link between contribution and spend will be broken.
  • CIL will not have a time limit on its spending.
  • It must be spent on infrastructure
    (i.e. the provision of Capital Schemes) and Local Authorities will be under a duty to report (on an annual basis) how much CIL has been received, how much CIL has been spent and on what, and how much CIL is held.


    The consequences of scaling back S106

Section 106 Agreements will be scaled back.

The Government proposes that the existing tests of reasonableness will become statutory rather than guidance, as they are at present.

It is proposed that Planning Obligations could only be required where they were needed to
solely mitigate the impact of the development.

This means that Obligations, such as the provision of highway access works or funding towards, for example a pedestrian crossing, that was only required because of a development would still be covered under Section 106, as would items like the provision of public realm that would eventually be adopted by the Council.

However, the proposed scaling back would prevent tariffs from being based on Section 106.

For Bristol this would mean that collecting contributions to Park and Ride, Open Space, Libraries and Education would no longer be allowed through Section 106 and would have to form part of a CIL.

Developer contributions (either financial contributions or on site provision) will continue to be made through Section 106.


    Related Documents

 

  Sign in   Recent Site Activity   Terms   Report Abuse   Print page  |  Powered by Google Sites